|
MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR NO. 2006-07
Series of 2006
TO: ALL CONCERNED
SUBJECT: GUIDELINES IN THE COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION FOR
VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 124 OF THE COOPERATIVE CODE OF THE
PHILIPPINES
Pursuant to CDA Board of Administrators Resolution No.
129, Series of 2006, the Authority hereby promulgates the
following internal guidelines in the Commencement of Action
for Violation of Article 124 of the Cooperative Code:
SECTION 1. TITLE. - These guidelines shall be
known as the Guidelines in the Commencement of Action for
the Violation of Article 124 of the Cooperative Code of the
Philippines.
SECTION 2. DEFINITION OF TERMS. - The following
words or terms shall mean:
-
Authority - shall refer to the Cooperative
Development Authority and its Extension Offices.
-
Code - shall refer to Republic Act No. 6938,
otherwise known as the Cooperative Code of the
Philippines.
-
Cooperative Laws - shall refer to the Code, Republic
Act No. 6939, the Rules and Regulations implementing
the Cooperative Code, and other issuances of the
Authority.
-
Board of Administrators - shall refer to the
Chairman and its six (6) members.
-
Investigating Officers - shall refer to the Legal
Officers and other qualified employees of the Authority
who are authorized to conduct preliminary investigation
of the acts/omissions in violation of the Code.
-
Legal Division - shall refer to the Central
Office.
-
Legal Unit - shall refer to the Extension
Offices.
-
Complaint – is a sworn statement in writing
charging a person or persons or organizations, whether
foreign or domestic, with any of the offenses mentioned
in Article 124 of the Code, subscribed by the aggrieved
party or any interested person, as the case may be.
SECTION 3. ACTS OR OMISSIONS PUNISHABLE. - The
following shall constitute acts or omissions punishable
under Article 124 of the Code:
-
The use of the word “Cooperative” by any
person or of person or organization, domestic or
foreign, unless registered as a cooperative under the
Code;
-
Direct or indirect interference or intervention in
the internal affairs of a cooperative of a public
official or employee of which he is not a member such
as, but not limited to, the following:
-
Influencing the election or appointment of officers,
directors, committee members and employees through
public or private endorsement or campaign for or
against any person or group of persons;
Requiring prior clearance for any policy or decision
within the cooperative;
Requesting or demanding the creation of positions or
organizational units, or recommending any person for
appointment, transfer, or removal from his position;
or
Any other acts inimical or adverse to the autonomy
and independence of cooperatives.
-
Violations made by directors, officers or committee
of a cooperative of the following provisions of the
Code:
Article 46 (Liability of directors, officers and
committee members)
Article 49 ( Disloyalty of a director)
Article 50 ( Illegal Use of Confidential
Information)
-
Any violations of any provision of the Code for
which no penalty is imposed.
SECTION 4. COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION.
An action for violation of any of the provisions of
Article 124 shall commence upon the filing of a complaint
in accordance with this guidelines or through the
endorsement from other government agencies or
instrumentalities or the respective departments of this
Authority. Any information obtained other than through a
complaint shall be given due course only after an initial
evaluation has been conducted. In no case shall a complaint
be given due course when the same is not in accordance with
the form prescribed in Section 5 hereof except when the
Authority itself initiates the action.
The Executive Director or Extension Office Director, as
the case maybe, upon receipt of a formal complaint or
complaints in accordance with these guidelines or any
information, written or otherwise from any aggrieved party
or from any interested party or through endorsement from
other government agencies or instrumentalities or the
respective departments of the Authority, shall refer the
same to the Legal Division or Legal Units as the case may
be, for determination of the need for preliminary
investigation.
The Legal Division or Legal Units, as the case may be,
shall determine whether there is sufficient evidence to
proceed with the investigation.
-
If there is no basis for the complaint, information
or endorsement referred to in the preceding paragraph,
the same shall be dismissed by the Authority through an
Order of Dismissal signed by the Executive Director or
Extension Office Director concerned upon the proper
recommendation of the Legal Division or the Legal Unit
concerned.
-
If there appears to be a violation of the Code, upon
recommendation of the Legal Division or the Legal Unit
concerned, an Order authorizing the conduct of
investigation shall be issued by the Authority through
the Executive Director or the Extension Office Director
concerned.
SECTION 5. FORM OF COMPLAINT. - All complaints
must be in affidavit form together with the accompanying
evidence, when available. When the Authority initiates the
investigation, the complaint need not be in affidavit
form.
The complaint should be written in a clear, simple and
concise language containing the following:
-
Full name and address of the aggrieved party or any
interested person;
-
Full name and address of the person or persons or
organizations, whether foreign or domestic complained
of;
-
A narration of the relevant and material facts which
shows the acts or omissions allegedly violated by such
person or persons or organizations, whether foreign or
domestic complained of; and,
-
Subscribed by the aggrieved party or any interested
person, as the case may be.
SECTION 6. CONDUCT OF FORMAL INVESTIGATION
In the conduct of investigation, the investigating
officer shall draft an investigation plan to ascertain the
following matters:
-
Nature of the violation;
-
Relevant laws, rules, regulations and orders;
-
Elements under which the existence of a violation is
proven;
-
Procedure for conducting the investigation; and,
-
The time frame for the conduct of the
investigation.
During an investigation, the investigating officer shall
have the authority to request for information and documents
and receive information through voluntary compliance. The
investigating officer may also require or allow any person
to file a statement in writing, under oath or otherwise as
he may determine, with respect to the facts and
circumstances relevant to the matter under
investigation.
In furtherance of the investigation and in the interest
of the service, he may also request the assistance of law
enforcement agencies.
The fact that a person, organization, director, officer
or committee member is under investigation shall remain
strictly confidential, unless otherwise provided under
these guidelines.
SECTION 7. INVESTIGATION REPORT. - After the
completion of the formal investigation, the Investigating
Officer shall submit an investigation report, which shall
include all the supporting evidence gathered, to the
Executive Director or the Extension Office Director as the
case may be.
If based on the Investigation Report submitted there is
a prima facie finding sufficient to warrant the filing of a
criminal complaint, the procedure shall be:
-
For complaints handled by the Extension Office
-
The Investigation Report together with a draft
complaint - affidavit with all the supporting
affidavits and evidence shall be forwarded to the Legal
Division-Central Office for evaluation.
The Legal Division shall complete its review within
ten (10) days from receipt of the draft
complaint-affidavit and investigation report. If the
same is meritorious, the Legal Division shall either
adopt the complaint-affidavit or draft a new
complaint-affidavit and shall prepare the case folder
which contains the case history and index of the
documents.
If the Legal Division does not find the contents of
the draft complaint-affidavit to be meritorious, if may
refer the case back to the Extension Office for further
case build-up or recommend the archiving of the draft
complaint-affidavit including the Investigation Report
to the Board of Administrators.
-
For complaints handled by the Central Office.
A review shall be conducted and the review shall be
completed within ten (10) days from receipt of the
investigation report and draft complaint-affidavit from
the Investigating Officer. If the case is meritorious,
the Investigating Officer upon approval of the Chief of
the Legal Division shall prepare the case folder which
contains the case history and index of the
documents.
If the same is not meritorious, the case may be
referred back to the investigating officer for further
case build-up or recommend the archiving of the draft
complaint-affidavit including the Investigation Report
to the Board of Administrators.
SECTION 8. DROPPING OF THE COMPLAINT-AFFIDAVIT. -
After or before the investigation but prior to the filing
of the complaint with the appropriate officer/court, the
complaint-affidavit may be dropped through the approval of
the Board of Administrators upon recommendation of the
Chief of the Legal Division with the concurrence of the
Executive Director.
SECTION 9. FILING OF COMPLAINT. - Upon approval
of the Board of Administrators of the complaint-affidavit,
the Legal Division or the Extension Office legal officer
assigned to the case, shall file the same in accordance
with the 2000 Revised Rules on Criminal Procedure, Rules of
Court of the Philippines.
SECTION 10. SEPARABILITY CLAUSE. - If any
provision or article of these guidelines is held invalid
the remaining provisions or articles shall not be affected
thereby.
SECTION 11. EFFECTIVITY. - These Guidelines shall
take effect fifteen (15) days following its filing in the
Office of the National Administrative Register, University
of the Philippines, Law Center.
June 30, 2006.
FOR THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATORS:
ORIGINAL SIGNED
LECIRA V. JUAREZ
Chairperson
|